Logo

ZeroOpposite

SEX ON SOCIAL MEDIA: HOW FACEBOOKS HANDLING OF ADULT CONTENT HAS SPARKED OUTRAGE RU EN ES

Sexuality is a common theme in literature, film, art, music, and everyday conversation, so it's no surprise that social media platforms like Facebook have struggled to create guidelines for how to handle posts involving sexually explicit material. In 2007, Larry Flynt, publisher of pornographic magazine Hustler and founder of the First Amendment Foundation, found himself at the center of this debate after his personal Facebook page was suspended due to links he posted about articles from his publication.

Flynt's page was temporarily blocked after he shared three links to Hustler Magazine articles about sex. The action sparked outrage among free speech advocates who accused Facebook of censorship and inconsistency. Despite being one of the world's most popular websites, Facebook has struggled to define what constitutes acceptable adult content since its inception. This incident highlighted the challenges facing social media companies as they grapple with balancing freedom of expression with user safety.

In an interview with NPR, Flynt said he felt singled out by Facebook's decision because other users had shared similar content without consequence. He also criticized the company's lack of transparency in explaining why he had been suspended. "They don't give me any explanation," Flynt told NPR. "All I know is that I was warned beforehand."

Facebook's policies regarding adult content have evolved over time. In 2019, CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced new rules aimed at reducing sexual content on the platform, including removing photos or videos depicting genitalia and prohibiting non-consensual nudity or sexual activity. However, these guidelines are not always clear-cut. For example, artistic nudity or breastfeeding images may be allowed if they meet certain criteria.

The suspension of Flynt's page raises important questions about the impact of social media moderation on freedom of expression. While some argue that platforms like Facebook should allow all content, others argue that they have a responsibility to protect their users from harmful material. It remains to be seen how Facebook and other social media giants will balance these competing priorities in the future.