How do individuals regulate their response to relational inequities is an important question that has been studied extensively by social psychologists. Relational inequities refer to situations where one person feels they are treated unfairly in comparison to another person. These inequalities can take many forms, such as being given less than equal access to resources, opportunities, or privileges compared to others. Individuals may respond to these perceived inequities in various ways, including through anger, resentment, withdrawal, or attempts to redress the imbalance.
How individuals regulate these responses is less well understood. This article will explore different methods individuals may employ to control their reactions to perceived relational inequities.
Researchers have identified several strategies individuals can use to manage their emotional and behavioral reactions to perceived relational inequities. One strategy is cognitive restructuring, which involves changing how individuals think about the situation and their own role in it.
Someone who feels they were passed over for a promotion might change their perspective to view themselves as still valuable employees who deserve recognition for their work. Cognitive restructuring allows individuals to maintain positive self-esteem while also acknowledging the existence of the inequality. Another approach is emotional regulation, which involves managing feelings of frustration, anger, or hurt caused by the perceived injustice. Emotional regulation techniques include deep breathing, meditation, mindfulness practices, and exercise. By controlling their emotions, individuals may be able to avoid escalating conflicts or engaging in counterproductive behaviors that could exacerbate the inequity.
Another method of response regulation is social comparison. Individuals may compare their situation with those around them to gain a broader perspective on their relative standing.
Someone who feels underpaid at work may compare their salary to colleagues' wages to put things into context. Social comparison can help individuals recognize when their perceptions of unfair treatment are valid, but it can also lead to unrealistic expectations if used too frequently or excessively.
Individuals can actively seek out opportunities to redress the perceived inequity through direct action or advocacy. This might involve speaking up in a meeting, filing a formal complaint, or pursuing legal action against an employer. Direct action allows individuals to take control of the situation and potentially improve their circumstances.
Individuals have several strategies available to manage their responses to perceived relational inequalities. These methods range from cognitive restructuring and emotional regulation to social comparison and direct action. The choice of strategy depends on many factors, including the individual's personality, values, and goals.
Understanding these different approaches can empower individuals to take control of their reactions and seek more equitable relationships in their personal and professional lives.
How do individuals regulate responses to perceived relational inequities?
Individuals typically employ several strategies to regulate their responses to perceived relational inequities. One approach is to engage in self-deception by denying or rationalizing away the inequity, while another involves shifting blame onto oneself or others. Additionally, some individuals may attempt to change the social context by influencing power dynamics or negotiating for better treatment.