Logo

ZeroOpposite

Contact Us
Search

SEXUALITY IN EDUCATION: HOW HIERARCHIES PERPETUATE EXCLUSION UNDER THE GUISE OF NEUTRALITY enIT FR DE PL TR PT RU AR JA CN ES

Educational hierarchies have been around for centuries, and they continue to be an essential part of modern society. They are often based on power dynamics that favor some groups over others. In recent years, there has been increased awareness of how these hierarchies can create barriers for certain groups, such as women, people of color, and LGBTQ+ individuals. This article will discuss how educational hierarchies perpetuate exclusion under the guise of neutrality, focusing on four areas: language, curriculum, teaching methods, and admissions processes.

Language plays a critical role in education because it is used to communicate knowledge and ideas.

Many educational institutions still rely on outdated and discriminatory language that reinforces existing hierarchies.

Using gendered terms like "man" or "woman" instead of gender-neutral terms can make some students feel uncomfortable and marginalized. Similarly, using sexist language like "boys will be boys" can contribute to a culture where boys are expected to act aggressively and girls are valued for their appearance. Educators must recognize their own biases and work towards creating more inclusive language.

Curricula also reflect educational hierarchies. Many curricula privilege white male perspectives while ignoring those of other groups.

Standard American history textbooks tend to focus on white men who played significant roles in shaping the country's political, social, and economic structures, with minimal mention of women, Black Americans, Indigenous peoples, or other non-white individuals. This creates a narrative that suggests only certain stories matter and perpetuates the myth of white supremacy. Curricula should strive to include diverse voices and perspectives from all cultures and backgrounds.

Teaching methods also have an impact on student outcomes. Traditional instructional practices often prioritize lecturing and memorization over active learning and critical thinking. These methods favor students who already possess cultural capital - knowledge gained through exposure to dominant culture - and leave behind those without it. Teachers should encourage collaboration, inquiry, creativity, and problem-solving to create a level playing field for all learners.

Admissions processes further entrench existing hierarchies. Elite institutions often rely on standardized tests and grades as gatekeepers, but these measures disadvantage low-income students and students of color. Standardized testing is biased against racial minorities because they typically score lower due to various factors such as socioeconomic status, education level, and language barriers. Similarly, grade inflation favors students from affluent families who can afford private tutors and extra resources outside of school. Institutions must consider alternative criteria like portfolios, essays, interviews, and extracurricular activities when selecting candidates.

Educational hierarchies are rooted in power dynamics that reinforce exclusion under the guise of neutrality. To combat this, educators must recognize their implicit biases, use inclusive language, incorporate diverse perspectives into curricula, employ active teaching methods, and rethink admissions policies. By doing so, we can create more equitable educational opportunities for everyone.

How do educational hierarchies perpetuate exclusion under the guise of neutrality?

Educational hierarchies are social structures that categorize individuals based on their academic achievement levels and provide them with access to different opportunities and resources. These hierarchies can be seen as a way to organize information and knowledge, but they also have a hidden impact on who is included and excluded from certain opportunities.

#educationalhierarchy#powerdynamics#exclusion#neutrality#language#curriculum#teachingmethods