The idea that inclusion can be morally justified while still requiring individuals to conform to existing social norms raises important ethical considerations. On one hand, societal values and norms provide structure and guidance for how individuals interact with one another, which can promote stability and order in society.
This also means that these norms may perpetuate inequalities based on race, gender, class, ability, or other characteristics.
If the status quo is white male supremacy, then asking people of color, women, LGBTQ+ individuals, and disabled persons to participate in this system without changing it would contradict the goals of equity and justice. Inclusion must involve dismantling oppressive systems and creating new ones that are more inclusive and just. Otherwise, it becomes a way for dominant groups to maintain their power while appearing progressive. This essay will explore the relationship between inclusion and conformity, as well as alternative approaches that prioritize justice and liberation.
It's important to define what we mean by "conforming to existing hierarchies." This refers to adherence to traditional roles, beliefs, and expectations within a given culture or community. It might include following dress codes, obeying authority figures, or complying with dominant narratives about gender, sexuality, or race. While conformity may seem necessary for participation in certain contexts, it often reinforces privilege and exclusion.
Strict dress codes may exclude non-binary individuals who don't fit into binary gender categories. Similarly, compliance with dominant narratives about race or sexuality may silence marginalized voices and perspectives. Inclusion requires an openness to diversity and difference, rather than demanding conformity to normative ideals.
There are different ways to approach inclusion beyond simply conforming to existing hierarchies. One option is to challenge and transform these structures themselves. This involves challenging dominant narratives and seeking alternatives that promote equality and liberation.
Feminist theory seeks to deconstruct patriarchy and create more egalitarian relationships between men and women. Queer theory questions heteronormativity and promotes greater fluidity of gender expression and identity. Disability studies explores ableism and advocates for accessibility and accommodation. These movements aim to change society at its core, not just make adjustments around the edges.
Another approach is to create new spaces where diverse individuals can connect without being forced to conform to the status quo. This might involve creating affinity groups or organizations that center underrepresented identities, as well as cultivating allyship among those in positions of power. These spaces could provide support and solidarity while allowing people to express themselves freely within their own communities.
Intersectional approaches acknowledge how multiple forms of oppression overlap and work together, requiring a holistic understanding of social justice issues.
It's important to recognize that inclusion is not always possible within existing systems. Sometimes, we must build entirely new ones that prioritize equity and justice. This means reimagining our institutions, policies, and practices from the ground up to ensure they reflect everyone's needs and experiences. It also requires recognizing and addressing historical injustices and power imbalances that have shaped our societies.
This process takes time, effort, and resources, and may face resistance from those who benefit from the status quo.
Inclusion cannot be moral if it demands conformity to existing hierarchies. Instead, we need to challenge these structures and create alternative ways of being together that are more inclusive and equitable. While some aspects of inclusion may require compromise and negotiation, true liberation requires dismantling harmful norms and building something new. We must continue to work towards a society where all voices are heard, respected, and celebrated for who they are.
Can inclusion be moral if it demands conformity to existing hierarchies?
Inclusion can still be considered moral even if it requires some degree of conforming to certain social norms and hierarchies as long as individuals are able to freely express their identity while being accepted for who they truly are. This is because true inclusion implies that everyone has access to opportunities for personal growth and empowerment within a society regardless of their background or identities, which may involve adapting to certain standards or expectations set by the community.