To explore whether moral virtue can include the courage to live openly in defiance of societal shame requires examining the nature of moral virtue itself and how it relates to individual choice and action. Moral virtue is generally defined as a character trait that enables one to make good decisions and act ethically in various situations. This suggests that living openly in defiance of societal norms could be considered morally virtuous if it involves making ethical choices and demonstrating a commitment to doing what is right despite potential social consequences.
This definition raises further questions about what constitutes moral action and how individuals should approach societal expectations when they conflict with personal beliefs and values.
In order to examine these issues, it may be helpful to consider the concept of 'moral luck' - the idea that moral behavior is often influenced by external factors beyond an individual's control, such as upbringing or cultural context. According to this view, individuals who have experienced oppression or marginalization may face greater challenges in upholding moral principles due to structural barriers that prevent them from exercising their agency freely. In such cases, engaging in moral acts may require taking risks that others are less likely to take, leading to a form of bravery or courage that deserves recognition for its commitment to justice and equality.
There is also the possibility that living openly in defiance of societal norms could create additional difficulties for individuals who do not fit into traditional gender roles or expectations.
LGBTQ+ people may experience harassment, discrimination, or violence as a result of coming out publicly, which may undermine their ability to pursue other forms of moral virtue such as kindness, generosity, or compassion. Similarly, those who challenge patriarchal structures or racist systems may face backlash or exclusion, which can limit their opportunities to contribute positively to society in other ways.
Whether living openly in defiance of societal shame qualifies as a morally virtuous act depends on both the individual's motivation and the broader social context in which they operate. While some may see this as a brave and noble decision, others may perceive it as selfish or even dangerous. Therefore, it is essential to consider how we define moral action within larger social and political frameworks and recognize the complex dynamics at play when individuals choose to live authentically despite potential consequences.
Can moral virtue include the courage to live openly in defiance of societal shame?
Moral virtue can indeed encompass the bravery to live authentically despite social disgrace. This notion is supported by psychologists such as Susan Fiske who argue that individuals are motivated to behave morally out of a desire for self-esteem and recognition from others (Fiske, 2017). In other words, people may choose to act ethically even when faced with negative consequences due to their need for positive feedback and validation from society.