Can queer performance practices be considered a legitimate form of qualitative research?
The term "queer" is often used to describe people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, nonbinary, asexual, intersex, pansexual, demisexual, and many other identities that fall outside traditional gender norms. In recent years, scholars have argued that these identities are important for understanding human behavior, including performance practices.
The question remains whether such studies can be considered qualitative research. Qualitative research is a methodology that involves gathering data through observations and interviews, rather than quantitative methods like surveys or experiments. This approach focuses on understanding the meaning behind behavior and experiences.
One example of queer performance practice is drag queen culture, where individuals use makeup, clothing, and performance to express their identity. Drag queens may perform at parties, clubs, bars, or other venues, often for entertainment purposes. They may also use their performances to educate audiences about issues related to LGBTQ+ rights and representation. Some argue that drag queens' performances can provide insights into how society views gender and sexuality. Others argue that such studies can be problematic because they involve subjectivity and personal interpretation.
Another example is performance art, which uses various media to convey messages about social justice, politics, and identity. Performance artists may create works based on their own experiences, using movement, sound, and visuals to communicate ideas. These performances can provide valuable information about the experiences of marginalized groups.
Some argue that performance art can be difficult to analyze objectively since it requires subjective interpretation.
A third example is ethnography, where researchers observe a group over time and write detailed descriptions of their daily lives. Ethnographies can provide valuable information about subcultures, including those with non-traditional sexual orientations and identities.
Critics point out that this method has its limitations, including potential bias and lack of control over variables.
In order to ensure rigor and authenticity in qualitative research involving queer performance practices, several methodologies must be followed. First, researchers should engage in participant observation, where they spend significant time with participants to understand their perspectives. Second, they should use semi-structured interviews, allowing participants to share their thoughts and feelings without being limited by predetermined questions. Third, they should triangulate data from multiple sources, including observations, interviews, and other documents.
They should ensure transparency by sharing their methods and findings with participants and the wider community.
Queer performance practices have the potential to offer unique insights into human behavior, including sexuality and gender roles. While there are challenges involved in analyzing such studies, these methodologies can help researchers maintain rigor and authenticity while exploring important topics.