The concept of "virtue" has been debated since antiquity, but it was usually defined according to heteronormative standards. Aristotle considered it as the mean between extremes, while Confucius believed it to be a quality that leads to good moral choices.
Modern philosophy has challenged this notion by arguing that individuals have different ways of experiencing their body and desires, which can alter traditional definitions of what constitutes virtue. Queer embodiment refers to how queer people perceive themselves and their bodies differently from the mainstream understanding of gender and sexual orientation.
Queer embodiment can transform the question "What is virtue?" into "What is freedom?" because it allows for a more expansive definition of virtue beyond conforming to societal norms. In other words, it suggests that true virtue lies in being authentic to oneself, regardless of one's sexual identity or orientation.
The ancient Greek philosophers did not consider homosexual relationships virtuous, yet they were seen as such by many contemporary scholars. This shows that morality is relative and depends on individual experiences.
Queer embodiment raises questions about agency and consent. When someone feels free to express their sexuality without fear or shame, it allows them to make conscious decisions about their life choices instead of following social expectations blindly. It also promotes self-acceptance and empowerment, which are essential components of personal growth.
Queer embodiment challenges society's binary conception of sex and gender. By rejecting rigid categories, it opens up new possibilities for exploring intimacy and relationship dynamics.
Some non-binary individuals may find meaningful connections with partners who do not identify with any particular gender. Similarly, polyamorous arrangements allow people to explore multiple forms of love and commitment outside of monogamy.
The concept of queer embodiment is still controversial, as it challenges traditional values and social norms. Some argue that it undermines family structures, moral principles, and religious beliefs. Others see it as an affront to tradition and conservatism. Nonetheless, it has gained traction among younger generations who seek greater freedom and expression in their lives.
The notion of queer embodiment suggests that true virtue lies in being authentic to oneself and rejecting societal pressures, thereby transforming the ancient question "What is virtue?" into "What is freedom?"
How does queer embodiment transform the ancient question “What is virtue?” into “What is freedom?”
In her 2016 essay "Queering Virtue," Jillian Weise explores how queer bodies and identities challenge traditional notions of morality and social norms by redefining what it means to be virtuous. By defying binary gender roles and sexual mores, queer individuals subvert the moral order that has historically been used to control and oppress marginalized communities.