Can acts of quiet resistance within the military create lasting cultural change? In recent years, there has been an increased focus on the role that individuals can play in creating meaningful social and political transformation through nonviolent direct action. This approach to social change is often referred to as "quiet resistance" or "passive protest." Quiet resistance involves refusing to cooperate with unjust systems while maintaining a peaceful demeanor and avoiding confrontation. It requires courage, creativity, and patience. One example of this strategy can be found in the work of civil rights activists who used sit-ins and boycotts to challenge segregation laws in the United States during the mid-20th century. Another example can be seen in the women's suffrage movement, which relied heavily on tactics such as picketing and petitioning to win the right to vote for women.
But what about the military? Can acts of quiet resistance within the military create lasting cultural change? The answer is yes - but it may take time, effort, and persistence.
Let's consider the context. The military is a hierarchical institution with strict rules and regulations governing behavior. Those who break those rules risk punishment, including demotion, dishonorable discharge, or even imprisonment. This makes organizing for change difficult, as people fear retaliation from their superiors if they speak out against injustice.
Individuals who are willing to take calculated risks and remain steadfast in their convictions can make progress over time.
One way that quiet resistance has been successful in the military is through the creation of support networks. These networks provide emotional support and practical assistance to those who want to resist injustices without making waves.
A group of soldiers might form an informal network to help each other navigate gender-based discrimination by sharing resources and information.
These networks can grow into a more formalized system of advocacy and accountability, helping to hold leaders accountable for their actions.
Another way that quiet resistance can work is through personal example. By living a life of integrity and refusing to participate in unethical practices, individuals can inspire others to follow suit. This approach requires courage and conviction, as well as patience. It may not be easy to see immediate results, but it can have a long-term impact on the culture of the organization.
Quiet resistance can also involve working within the system to bring about change. This means finding allies among like-minded individuals and leveraging existing channels for feedback and reform.
Soldiers might use formal channels such as unit meetings or grievance procedures to raise concerns about inequality or abuse. While this approach may seem less dramatic than public protests or strikes, it can be just as effective over time.
Acts of quiet resistance within the military can create lasting cultural change - but only with persistence, courage, and creativity. Those who choose this path must be prepared to endure setbacks and take risks, but they can make a real difference in shaping the future of their institution.
Can acts of quiet resistance within the military create lasting cultural change?
Although there are many examples of individuals who have engaged in quiet resistance within the military during times of war or conflict, it is unclear whether these actions alone can result in long-term cultural changes within organizations like the military. While some scholars suggest that individual actions of nonviolent protest can lead to broader social movements and political change, others argue that larger structural factors often influence the success of such efforts.