In this essay, I will explore how proximity to danger affects intimacy, attachment, and relational stability among same-sex military couples. I will begin by defining intimacy, attachment, and relational stability and discussing their importance in romantic relationships. Then, I will explain how proximity to danger can impact these aspects of a relationship between partners who are serving in the military together.
I will provide examples from research studies that have investigated these issues.
Intimacy refers to the level of emotional closeness and connection that two people share in a romantic relationship. Attachment refers to the psychological bond that forms between two individuals as they become closer to each other over time. Relational stability refers to the ability of a relationship to withstand challenges and maintain its integrity over an extended period. These three factors are crucial for the health and longevity of a romantic relationship, regardless of whether or not the couple is engaged in military service.
Military service can introduce unique stressors into a relationship, which can affect intimacy, attachment, and relational stability.
Being deployed far away from one's partner can lead to feelings of loneliness and isolation, which may undermine intimacy.
The risk of injury or death associated with military service can create fear and anxiety, which can interfere with attachment.
Frequent moves and separations can make it difficult to establish long-term stability in a relationship.
Proximity to danger can further exacerbate these challenges. When soldiers are stationed in combat zones or otherwise at risk of harm, they may be unable to communicate freely with their partners due to security concerns. This lack of communication can diminish intimacy by making it harder for couples to stay connected emotionally. It can also make it more difficult to feel safe expressing vulnerability or sharing secrets. In addition, proximity to danger can increase anxiety and stress, leading to conflicts within the relationship.
The uncertainty of deployment dates and schedules can make it difficult for couples to plan for the future and establish stability in their relationship.
Research has explored these issues among same-sex military couples specifically. One study found that same-sex military couples reported higher levels of intimacy than heterosexual couples, but lower levels of relational stability (Stanton & Smith, 2013). Another study found that same-sex military couples experienced greater challenges in maintaining intimacy and attachment due to the stigma surrounding homophobia within the military (Taylor et al., 2017).
Both studies highlight the importance of support networks and social connection in mitigating the negative effects of being in a military relationship.
Proximity to danger can impact intimacy, attachment, and relational stability in romantic relationships, including those between same-sex military couples. Understanding these challenges is crucial for promoting healthy and stable relationships among service members.
Supporting and advocating for LGBTQ+ rights in the military can help create a safer and more welcoming environment for all service members, regardless of their sexual orientation.
How does proximity to danger affect intimacy, attachment, and relational stability among same-sex military couples?
According to research on romantic relationships, the physical presence of partners can lead to increased intimacy and attachment. This is because being close to someone helps build closeness through sensory experience (e. g. , touching), shared experiences (e. g. , going out together), mutual disclosure of thoughts and feelings (e. g. , telling each other about their day).