The erotic dimension of leadership refers to the emotional, physical, and psychological attraction between leaders and their followers that can lead to feelings of desire, lust, infatuation, and even love. It is often seen as a taboo subject in the context of leadership because it challenges traditional ideas about what constitutes appropriate behavior for those in positions of power.
Some have argued that this dimension cannot be ignored due to its potential benefits, such as increased motivation, loyalty, and creativity among followers. In this article, I will examine whether the erotic dimension of leadership can be reconciled with ethical theories of governance and civic duty.
Let's consider one of the most prominent ethical theories in leadership: Utilitarianism. This theory holds that the best course of action is the one that maximizes overall happiness or wellbeing, taking into account both individual and collective interests. According to utilitarianism, leaders should act in ways that promote the greatest good for the greatest number of people. The erotic dimension of leadership can fit within this framework if it leads to positive outcomes for individuals and society.
If a leader's sexual relationship with a follower increases the latter's job satisfaction and productivity, which then contributes to the organization's success, it could be considered ethically justified according to utilitarianism.
We turn to virtue ethics. This theory focuses on developing virtuous character traits, such as honesty, justice, and courage. Virtue ethics suggests that leaders should strive to become the kind of person they want their followers to be. This means that leaders should not only behave morally but also embody moral qualities. The erotic dimension of leadership can conflict with virtue ethics because it involves risks of exploitation, manipulation, and abuse.
Some have argued that when used responsibly, an erotically-charged leadership style can foster trust, loyalty, and respect among followers. It all depends on how leaders handle their relationships with their subordinates.
There is deontological ethics, which emphasizes following rules and duties set by society, such as laws and norms. Leaders who adhere to these principles are seen as acting rightly regardless of the consequences. Deontology can view the erotic dimension of leadership as unethical since it challenges traditional norms about appropriate behavior between superiors and subordinates.
Deontology may allow for exceptions in cases where the benefits outweigh the harms or if there is explicit consent from both parties.
While the erotic dimension of leadership challenges traditional ideas about what constitutes appropriate behavior for those in power, it cannot be ignored entirely due to its potential benefits. Whether it is reconcilable with ethical theories of governance and civic duty ultimately depends on how leaders manage their relationships with their subordinates and whether they prioritize individual and collective wellbeing over personal gratification.
Can the erotic dimension of leadership be reconciled with ethical theories of governance and civic duty?
According to scholarship on leadership, there is no direct correlation between the "erotic" dimension of leadership and ethical theories of governance and civic duty. While some scholars argue that sexual attraction can play a role in leadership effectiveness, others contend that it may not necessarily align with ethical norms and values.