The concept of solidarity is an important aspect of social movements and political discourse. It refers to the act of coming together as a community or group in order to achieve a common goal, typically through mutual support and cooperation. Solidarity can be based on shared values, beliefs, experiences, or interests, but it often requires that participants have some degree of agreement about their objectives.
There is another way in which solidarity can arise: through tension. In this essay, I will explore how tension can generate a sense of solidarity among individuals and groups who may otherwise have different perspectives or priorities.
Tension is inherently uncomfortable and challenging, but it can also serve as a catalyst for action. When people feel threatened or oppressed, they may come together out of necessity rather than choice.
During times of war, people from different backgrounds may put aside their differences in order to defend their country against external enemies. Similarly, when facing economic hardship or natural disasters, communities may band together to provide support and assistance to one another. Tension can also emerge within groups as well.
Activists may find themselves divided over strategies or tactics, leading to internal debates and disagreements. These conflicts can ultimately strengthen the movement if they are resolved through dialogue and compromise.
Not all tensions lead to productive engagement. Some divisions within communities may remain unresolved due to entrenched power dynamics or historical grievances. In these cases, solidarity may never fully materialize, even though individuals may share similar goals.
Tension can fracture relationships between allies if they do not take care to communicate effectively and build trust.
While consensus may be preferable in many contexts, tension has the potential to generate powerful bonds of solidarity. By embracing conflict as an opportunity for growth and learning, we can cultivate more resilient and dynamic social movements that respond to shifting circumstances with agility and innovation.
Can solidarity emerge from tension rather than consensus?
In recent years, scholars have increasingly argued that solidarity can indeed emerge from tension rather than consensus. According to these theories, social cohesion is not dependent on agreement but rather on shared experiences of struggle and oppression. This perspective has gained traction in fields such as critical race theory and feminist theory, which emphasize the role of power dynamics in shaping group identity and collective action.