The philosophical assumption that underlies social contract theory is that society exists to serve individuals' needs. This means that society is created for the sake of individuals rather than individuals being created for society.
Queer perspectives question this assumption and suggest that society may exist as an expression of human relationships rather than simply meeting individual needs. Queer perspectives challenge the idea that there can be one "ideal" way of living or one "normal" relationship structure. They argue that there are many different ways of living and relating, including nontraditional forms such as polyamory, open relationships, kink, and more. These alternative relationship structures challenge the notion that society should strive for conformity and sameness. They also suggest that some traditional relationship structures might not work for everyone, such as heteronormative monogamy.
Queer perspectives also challenge the idea that society is based on rational choice and economic self-interest. Instead, they emphasize the importance of emotional connections and intimacy in shaping society. Queer perspectives highlight the role of erotic desire in creating social bonds and challenging traditional norms around gender roles and power dynamics. They ask why society should prioritize certain types of relationships or desires over others, suggesting instead that all forms of love and connection should be valued equally.
Queer perspectives suggest that the social contract is not a static agreement but constantly evolving. As individuals and communities change their ideas about what constitutes a good life, the social contract must adapt to reflect these changes. Queer perspectives remind us that there is no single, universal set of values or beliefs that apply to everyone; instead, we need to recognize diversity and pluralism in our understanding of society.
Queer perspectives offer an important counterpoint to social contract theory by highlighting the value of individual freedom, emotional connections, and pluralism. By questioning the assumptions underlying this theory, they push us to rethink how we construct our social world and create new ways of living together.
How do queer perspectives challenge the philosophical assumptions underlying social contract theory?
In philosophy, social contract theory proposes that individuals agree to enter into a social contract with one another in order to establish rules and norms that govern their behavior and relationships within society. This theory assumes that individuals have certain natural rights and freedoms that should be respected by others in society, but it also assumes that these rights are limited and conditional upon their agreement to participate in the social contract.