Many people hold assumptions about what is "normal" when it comes to human bodies. These assumptions can come from various sources such as media, society, culture, and even personal experience.
When it comes to medical care, these same assumptions can have serious implications. This essay will explore how the concept of normalcy in anatomy has been used to reinforce power dynamics between medicine and identity.
Let's examine the way that gender norms are constructed through the lens of medicine. Traditionally, medicine has viewed gender as binary, meaning there are only two genders - male and female. This belief system often excludes individuals who identify as transgender or non-binary.
If someone identifies as agender but presents at birth as female, they may be denied access to certain medical procedures or treatments because their assigned sex does not match their identity. Similarly, if someone who was assigned male at birth wishes to transition to female, they may face barriers due to a lack of understanding around non-cisgender identities.
Cultural norms play a significant role in determining what is considered "normal." Many cultures place value on particular body types or physical attributes.
Western societies tend to celebrate thinness while other cultures might emphasize larger figures. In some cases, this can lead to fatphobia where individuals with larger bodies are discriminated against by doctors or healthcare providers.
Societal standards of beauty can affect how patients are treated. Those who fit into those standards may receive more positive attention and treatment than others.
Sexual orientation also plays a part in shaping perceptions of "normal" anatomy. Heteronormativity assumes that everyone is either straight or cisgender, which can cause discomfort for LGBTQ+ individuals seeking care. Healthcare providers may assume that all couples are heterosexual, leading to misunderstandings about sexual practices or preferences. It's essential to recognize the power dynamics at play here and work towards creating more inclusive spaces for all people seeking medical help.
Notions of normalcy surrounding anatomy reinforce power dynamics between medicine and identity. This essay has explored three ways these assumptions impact marginalized groups - gender, culture, and sexual orientation. By recognizing the complex intersections between these factors, we can begin to create more equitable access to healthcare for everyone.
How do notions of “normal” anatomy reinforce power dynamics between medicine and identity?
Medicine has historically been viewed as a domain that is dominated by men and white people who have been able to define what constitutes "normal" anatomy based on their own experiences and perspectives. This dominant viewpoint has led to a situation where certain body types are seen as more desirable than others, creating power imbalances between different groups of people.