The issue of how military personnel view the relationship between emotional support and operational duty has been extensively researched and discussed for decades. On one hand, there is an argument that the role of a soldier involves focusing solely on fulfilling their job requirements without being distracted by personal feelings or interpersonal connections.
It can be argued that emotional connection and support are critical to maintaining morale, motivation, and cohesion within a team during times of crisis. This essay explores both sides of the debate and seeks to understand how soldiers perceive this balance in real life scenarios.
Emotional Support in the Military
Emotional support in the military refers to the degree to which members feel free to express their feelings, communicate openly about issues affecting them, and receive compassionate care from other individuals. It also includes the extent to which they feel comfortable receiving help when needed and giving support to others who may require it. In theory, providing emotional support should enable soldiers to perform better under pressure and collaborate effectively as a unit.
Studies have found that units with higher levels of emotional support tend to exhibit greater resilience, adaptability, creativity, and effectiveness during combat operations (Klein et al., 2013).
Some argue that prioritizing emotional support over mission-related tasks could compromise operational readiness. Soldiers must focus entirely on completing their duties to ensure success on the battlefield. Any distraction could jeopardize individual safety and collective outcomes. Thus, many experts advocate for limiting the role of emotion in the military setting. According to these scholars, soldiers must subdue personal needs and interests in favor of accomplishing mission objectives. They emphasize the need for discipline, selflessness, and professionalism above all else (Galula, 1964; Kohn & Leese, 2017).
Operational Responsibility in the Military
Operational responsibility entails fulfilling one's job requirements without interruption or delay. This principle is closely linked to maintaining high standards of professionalism and integrity within the military ranks. Failure to adhere to this principle can lead to disciplinary actions such as court martial or dishonorable discharge. Therefore, many believe that operational duty comes first and should take precedence over other considerations, including emotions.
Some argue that emotions play a vital role in military life. Many soldiers face traumatic experiences, such as witnessing death or engaging in violent encounters. Emotional support may be necessary to help them cope with these challenges.
Studies have shown that combat veterans who received psychological treatment fared better than those who did not receive therapy after returning from deployment (Blanco et al., 2011). Similarly, research suggests that soldiers who feel supported by their peers exhibit lower levels of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (Bryant & Harvey, 2018).
How soldiers perceive the balance between emotional support and operational duty varies depending on individual context and personal circumstances. Some prioritize mission objectives while others emphasize emotional connection.
Most agree that both factors are essential for success on the battlefield. Balancing these elements effectively requires awareness, understanding, and effective communication among all personnel involved.
How do soldiers perceive the balance between emotional support and operational responsibility?
The soldiers who serve their countries may often feel conflicted when it comes to balancing their responsibilities on the battlefield with the need for emotional support from family and friends back home. On one hand, they must be mentally prepared for any eventuality that could arise during combat operations, which requires them to focus solely on completing their missions.