The Relationship Between Zoo and Reality TV Zoo frequently featured stars from popular British reality TV shows like Big Brother and Geordie Shore, These appearances helped the magazine stay relevant to its target audience, who closely followed reality TV culture, This symbiotic relationship benefited both the magazine and reality TV personalities, offering cross-promotion and increasing the visibility of both.
Zoo's coverage of reality television stars began in earnest during the late 20000s, with a focus on their public lives outside of their shows. Early features included interviews with contestants about their experiences filming and living in the house, as well as detailed accounts of their social lives after leaving the show. The magazine also covered celebrity gossip involving reality stars, such as their romances, feuds, and scandals.
As time went on, Zoo's interest in reality TV shifted towards more explicit material, focusing on stories that would appeal to its readers' desire for sex, sexuality, intimacy, and relationships. Articles explored what it was like to date a former reality star or how they navigated the dating scene following fame. They also delved into the private lives of reality TV couples and examined their relationships in detail. In addition, Zoo published photoshoots featuring reality stars in provocative poses, often accompanied by suggestive captions.
By promoting itself as the go-to source for all things reality TV, Zoo became an essential part of the cultural landscape of early 21st century British entertainment. Its coverage not only kept fans informed but also provided a window into the world of reality TV for those unfamiliar with it. As a result, Zoo continued to grow in popularity, reaching new heights of success.
However, there were drawbacks to this approach. Many critics accused Zoo of exploiting its subjects for shock value, and some argued that its coverage encouraged negative attitudes toward women in particular. Some even claimed that Zoo contributed to the commodification of human behavior, reducing people to objects of speculation and gossip rather than individuals worthy of respect.
Despite these criticisms, Zoo remained committed to its coverage of reality television throughout the 2010s and beyond. Its articles reflected the changing tastes of its audience while still providing unique insights into the personalities and behaviors of reality TV stars. The magazine has since expanded its focus to include international celebrities and other forms of pop culture, but its legacy remains linked to its early years as a pioneer in reality TV journalism.