The idea that love can be used as a form of resistance against the alienating effects of instrumental rationality and social utility is one that has been explored by various philosophers, sociologists, and cultural critics throughout history. In this essay, I will explore some of these perspectives and examine their relevance for understanding the relationship between love and resistance.
Instrumental rationality refers to the tendency to treat individuals as means rather than ends in themselves, often resulting in exploitation and domination. According to Michel Foucault, modern society has become increasingly focused on quantifying and objectifying people in order to maximize efficiency and productivity. This logic has led to the commodification of human labor, as well as the development of technologies such as surveillance and data collection that further alienate individuals from each other and their own subjective experiences. Love, on the other hand, involves valuing another person for who they are rather than what they can do or produce. It requires vulnerability and intimacy, which cannot be reduced to economic or utilitarian calculations. As a result, it represents a challenge to the dominant logic of instrumental rationality.
Social utility emphasizes conformity to social norms and expectations, often at the expense of individual autonomy and creativity. As Alasdair MacIntyre argues, modern society has developed a narrow conception of what counts as "success" or "achievement", leading many people to feel isolated and disconnected from others. By contrast, love recognizes the unique value and dignity of each person, regardless of their status or accomplishments. By prioritizing relationships over achievements, love resists the idea that worth is determined by external standards.
It is important to note that not all forms of love are inherently resistant to instrumental rationality and social utility.
Capitalism has co-opted romantic ideals in order to sell products and services. Consumerist culture encourages individuals to seek out partners based on superficial criteria such as appearance or wealth, rather than genuine connection and mutual respect. In this sense, the commodification of love undermines its power as a form of resistance.
Despite these limitations, there are still ways in which love can be used as a form of resistance against alienation.
Intimate relationships can provide refuge from the pressures of capitalism and the demands of consumer culture. They offer an alternative source of meaning and satisfaction, one that is not dependent on material goods or societal approval.
Acts of care and kindness towards others can challenge the selfish logic of instrumental rationality by affirming the intrinsic value of human life.
While love may not always be able to completely overcome instrumental rationality and social utility, it does offer an important challenge to them. By valuing the individual and promoting authentic connection, it represents a way of living that counters the dehumanizing effects of modern society.
Can love be seen as a form of resistance to the alienation produced by instrumental rationality and social utility?
Love is an intangible feeling that many people experience in different ways throughout their lives. It is often described as a deep affection for another individual, a desire to care for and protect them, and a need to connect on an emotional level. While it may seem like a positive force, love can also be used to resist the pressures of instrumental rationality and social utility, which are two concepts that can lead to feelings of isolation and disconnection.