Citation This study focuses on Facebook relationship confession groups that allow discussions about sex and intimacy to explore the paradoxical environment they create where authenticity coexists with performative vulnerability, examining how participants psychologically navigate it. These groups provide a space for individuals to share their experiences, feelings, and desires related to sex and intimacy, often anonymously and without fear of judgment.
They also present a paradox whereby participants must balance their genuine emotions with the need to maintain a certain level of performance to avoid negative reactions from others. By analyzing comments and interactions within these groups, this study reveals a complex dynamic wherein users engage in both authentic self-expression and calculated self-presentation, resulting in a nuanced understanding of the relationship between vulnerability and performance in online spaces.
Citation Performativity is defined as "the process by which social norms are created, reproduced, challenged or transformed" (Butler, 19888), referring to the ways in which people act out socially constructed roles through language and behavior. In relationship confession groups, participants often engage in performative vulnerability, expressing themselves while simultaneously presenting a facade of strength and resilience. They may use emojis or other markers to signal humor or lightness, downplay their struggles or exaggerate their successes, and censor details that could lead to negative feedback. Through this process, they negotiate the boundaries of what is acceptable and appropriate within the group, creating a layered performance of emotional openness that hides underlying insecurities and anxieties.
Citation Authenticity, on the other hand, refers to the degree to which individuals express their true selves, free from external influence or manipulation. In relationship confession groups, this can be challenging due to the desire for acceptance and validation from others. Participants may share personal information or express difficult emotions, but must also navigate potential responses from group members who may judge or dismiss them. This creates a tension between the need for genuine expression and the fear of being ostracized, leading to an authenticity that is both genuine and carefully curated. By exploring these dynamics, this study reveals the complex psychological processes behind online intimacy and sexuality.
In what ways do Facebook relationship confession groups that allow discussions about sex and intimacy create a paradoxical environment where authenticity coexists with performative vulnerability, and how do participants psychologically navigate this duali
Facebook relationship confession groups that allow discussions about sex and intimacy often present a paradoxical environment where authenticity coexists with performative vulnerability, creating tension for users as they try to determine how much of their real selves to share online. Participants may feel pressured to present an idealized version of themselves, either by posting only positive experiences or censoring more personal details.