Algorithms are computer programs that can process data to solve problems. They work using mathematical formulas and logic. Algorithms are used everywhere - from search engines to social media feeds to online dating apps. But how do algorithms reflect societal biases that marginalize queer voices?
I will explore how algorithmic bias affects queer individuals and how it perpetuates inequality. I will also provide examples of real-world scenarios where queer people have been discriminated against due to algorithmic bias.
I will suggest some solutions for reducing algorithmic bias.
Algorithmic Bias
Algorithms are designed by humans, who may unconsciously embed their own biases into the code. This means that algorithms can reflect societal norms and prejudices, which often marginalize queer voices.
An online shopping website might show different ads to men and women based on gender stereotypes about what they should buy. Similarly, a job application algorithm could favor straight applicants over queer ones because the company believes heterosexuality is more common in the industry.
Examples of Algorithmic Bias
One recent example of algorithmic bias was when Tinder introduced "Elo" scores to match users. The Elo score is supposed to measure compatibility between two people.
It turned out that the algorithm favored white, cisgender, heteronormative individuals, even though those characteristics were not part of the matching criteria. As a result, many queer people felt excluded from the platform and left it altogether.
Another example is facial recognition technology, which has been shown to misidentify trans and non-binary individuals as their assigned sex at birth. This can lead to dangerous situations where law enforcement officials use incorrect data to arrest or harass someone.
Solutions for Reducing Algorithmic Bias
To reduce algorithmic bias, companies need to be transparent about how their algorithms work and collect diverse feedback from users. They also need to hire developers with diverse backgrounds and perspectives to ensure all voices are represented in the design process.
They should implement robust quality control measures to check for bias before releasing new products or updates.
Algorithms can perpetuate societal biases against queer individuals by reflecting norms and prejudices. Companies must take steps to reduce this bias by being transparent about their algorithms and including diverse viewpoints in development. If we want to create a more just society, we must address algorithmic bias head-on.
How do algorithms reflect societal biases that marginalize queer voices?
One of the ways algorithms can reflect societal biases is through their design and implementation. As algorithms are created by humans, they may incorporate certain values and beliefs that are prevalent in society. This means that they may be more likely to privilege certain perspectives over others, such as those of heteronormativity or cisgenderism.