In times of stressful events, soldiers may form close bonds and experience intense feelings of love, passion, and desire.
These feelings can be hard to interpret as genuine or situational. During high-stress situations, such as combat, trauma, disasters, or other emergencies, people may feel a strong sense of belonging, affection, and intimacy toward one another that goes beyond normal levels. This phenomenon is known as "bonding" or "emotional closeness." Some researchers believe that bonding between soldiers results from heightened emotions during difficult circumstances. Others argue that it is due to a lack of privacy and confinement, leading to an artificial intimacy.
Bonding can lead to a range of physical and mental health effects.
Studies have shown that soldiers who experienced bonding after a traumatic event had lower rates of PTSD than those who did not. The authors suggest this could be because bonded soldiers felt more supported and understood, reducing their risk for isolation and social withdrawal.
Some experts warn that bonding should not be taken as authentic, but rather seen as a result of environmental conditions that are unnatural in non-combat settings.
One theory is that soldiers who bond under stress tend to view each other as family members or comrades rather than romantic partners. They might even refer to themselves as "brothers," "fathers," or "mothers" instead of lovers or spouses. This kind of language reflects the depth of their connection and commitment to each other. As one soldier put it: "I love my brothers like I would never love anyone else."
Some soldiers see bonding as an illusion created by shared adversity. They say they do not feel any genuine feelings toward their fellow soldiers but simply accept them as part of the group dynamic. These soldiers may feel guilty about how much time they spend together and question whether their behavior is appropriate outside of military life.
Interpreting the closeness formed among soldiers under extreme stress is complex. Some research suggests it is situationally motivated while others argue it is authentic. Regardless of its origin, bonding has clear psychological implications for soldiers' well-being and long-term relationships.
How do soldiers interpret emotional closeness formed under extreme stress as authentic or situationally motivated?
While soldiers often form strong bonds of friendship due to their shared experience on the battlefield, it can be difficult for them to determine whether these relationships are genuine or simply a product of circumstance. The close-knit nature of military life and the reliance on teamwork during combat situations can create an atmosphere where individuals feel an intense connection with one another that is not always sustainable outside of this environment.