Non-binary temporality refers to the belief that time is not linear but rather exists simultaneously across multiple dimensions. This concept has been explored extensively in philosophy and literature, particularly in works such as Jorge Luis Borges' "Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius" and Umberto Eco's "Foucault's Pendulum." Non-binary temporality challenges the traditional view of time as a linear progression from past to present to future, instead arguing that all moments exist concurrently. In this essay, I will explore how non-binary temporality can inform ethical considerations around presence, delay, and transformation.
Non-binary temporality teaches us that time is inherently subjective and cannot be objectively measured. The notion of time as a constant stream flowing from one point to another can create a false sense of urgency and pressure to act immediately, leading to unethical behaviors such as impulsiveness or hasty decision making. By recognizing that time is non-linear, we can approach situations with more patience and mindfulness, allowing ourselves to make considered decisions based on long-term consequences.
When choosing between two job offers, it may be wise to wait and evaluate each option carefully before making a final choice, rather than rushing into a decision based solely on the perceived urgency of the moment.
Non-binary temporality highlights the importance of delayed gratification and delayed action. In many cases, waiting for the right time to take action can lead to better outcomes. A classic example is investment: by putting money aside gradually over time, an individual can build up capital for bigger returns in the future. Similarly, building relationships takes time and patience; attempting to force intimacy too soon can lead to disappointment or even harm. Non-binary temporality reminds us that our actions have consequences beyond the immediate moment and that we must balance short-term needs with long-term goals.
Non-binary temporality emphasizes the transformative nature of change. Traditional linear views of time suggest that change occurs sequentially, with events unfolding in a predictable order.
Non-binary temporalists argue that change can occur simultaneously across multiple dimensions, creating unexpected connections and innovations. This notion has practical applications in fields like science and technology, where new discoveries often arise from unlikely combinations of existing knowledge. By embracing the potential for transformation through unexpected connections, individuals and organizations can develop creative solutions to complex problems.
Non-binary temporality challenges traditional notions of time and presents a more nuanced view of its impact on ethical behavior. By recognizing that all moments exist concurrently, we can cultivate mindfulness and deliberation in decision making, prioritize long-term goals, and embrace the possibility of transformation through unexpected connections. As we continue to explore this concept, it promises to inform our understanding of time as well as our approach to ethics in daily life.
What does non-binary temporality teach about the ethics of presence, delay, and transformation?
Non-binary temporality refers to the idea that time is not linear but rather exists on multiple planes simultaneously, with each moment containing its past, present, and future. This concept has implications for ethical considerations regarding presence, delay, and transformation. In terms of presence, non-binary temporality suggests that there are multiple versions of oneself existing at once, which can challenge ideas about identity and selfhood.