Queer and non-queer soldiers may experience different levels of acceptance from their fellow troops during wartime, leading to potential tensions that could negatively impact military operations.
Some scholars argue that combat zones can also foster camaraderie across sexual orientations through shared experiences such as hardship, danger, and fear. In this article, I will explore how queer and non-queer soldiers come together on the battlefield despite their differences and why solidarity between them matters for unit cohesion and success in battle.
Background: Differences between Queer and Non-Queer Soldiers
The US military has historically excluded LGBTQ+ people until relatively recently when attitudes began changing in the early 2010s. Prior to these changes, many queer service members had to hide their identities to avoid discrimination and harassment. Even today, openly gay soldiers face challenges due to societal prejudice or discomfort with queerness among certain groups. Many have experienced homophobic taunts, bullying, and even violence from other soldiers who disapprove of their sexual orientation. This contributes to a sense of isolation and alienation that can make it difficult for queer soldiers to trust their peers and feel safe within their units.
Non-queer soldiers, meanwhile, are not necessarily homophobic but may have limited exposure to queer individuals outside of military settings. They may hold stereotypes about gay men and lesbian women based on cultural messages that suggest they are promiscuous, flamboyant, or unfit for traditional masculinity/femininity roles.
Some straight soldiers find themselves sharing close quarters with queer troops in combat situations where closeness is necessary for survival.
They may develop friendships across sexual orientations by recognizing shared values such as loyalty, bravery, and teamwork.
Coming Together on the Battlefield
Combat conditions create an environment where soldiers must rely on each other for support, protection, and success. In this context, differences between queer and non-queer service members become less important than common goals such as defeating the enemy or completing missions successfully. Queer and non-queer soldiers can build solidarity through shared hardships such as long deployments, sleep deprivation, physical exhaustion, and mental stress. They also face similar challenges like uncertainty over whether they will return home alive after every mission or struggle with PTSD upon returning home.
Sexual tension arises naturally in high-stress environments due to the intensity of battle and proximity of comrades. Some studies suggest that sexual attraction can even increase during wartime when life is threatened or adrenaline levels rise. This does not always lead to romance or intimacy but may promote a sense of connection and empathy among troops who recognize each other's vulnerabilities and strengths.
These shared experiences foster bonds that transcend sexual orientation and allow queer and non-queer soldiers to work together effectively despite their differences.
The Importance of Solidarity
Solidarity between queer and non-queer troops enhances unit cohesion by reducing friction caused by differences in identity. When everyone feels accepted and valued within the group, it promotes trust, loyalty, and morale. This translates into better communication, collaboration, and decision-making processes on the battlefield, which are essential for tactical success.
Alliances across sexual orientations signal to opponents that all soldiers stand united against them regardless of personal beliefs or backgrounds. This can demoralize enemies and make them more likely to surrender or retreat.
Building solidarity between queer and non-queer troops requires effort from both sides. Queer service members must actively seek out non-queer peers and demonstrate their value as skilled fighters who deserve respect. Non-queer soldiers should challenge homophobic attitudes and avoid stereotyping based on sexual orientation. By doing so, they create an inclusive environment where all soldiers feel comfortable sharing their identities without fear of judgment or prejudice. In turn, this allows them to work together harmoniously toward common goals with less distraction and greater efficacy.
Can the battlefield become a site of solidarity rather than division for queer and non-queer soldiers?
Yes, the battlefield can be a site of solidarity rather than division for queer and non-queer soldiers. Research suggests that many soldiers find camaraderie and connection on the battlefield despite their differences in sexual orientation, gender identity, or other characteristics. This is because they are united by a shared goal of protecting their country and fighting for a cause they believe in.