To understand if the moral worth of an individual is based on their compliance with social standards or devotion to true self-expression, one must first define what morality means. Morality can be described as the principles that govern an individual's conduct regarding right or wrong, good or bad behavior, and ethical guidelines. It encompasses the values and beliefs individuals hold about how they ought to behave towards others, themselves, and the world around them. These norms are frequently communicated through culture, society, religion, laws, customs, and traditions.
The argument for conforming to societal expectations holds that following established norms leads to harmonious living among people. People who adhere to these rules become integrated into a community, receive acceptance from others, avoid punishment, and live peacefully. Accordingly, they can benefit from cooperation and collaboration while upholding a sense of belonging and identity within a group. By sticking to common standards, individuals contribute to maintaining the stability and order in society.
This approach also suggests that individuals should prioritize the needs of the collective over their own desires or aspirations. This may result in sacrificing personal autonomy and creativity, leading to feelings of subjugation and powerlessness.
Those who prioritize authenticity argue that individuals should follow their hearts and seek inner truth. They believe that being genuine is essential for fulfillment, growth, and integrity. Authenticity requires honesty, transparency, vulnerability, and self-awareness, which lead to a deeper connection with oneself, others, and nature. This approach encourages personal development, originality, independence, freedom, and individuality. Yet, it can be challenging to navigate the complexities of social relationships when expressing oneself authentically, as one's choices may differ from those of others.
Pursuing one's unique interests and beliefs may isolate an individual and disrupt harmony in the group.
Both morality based on compliance and authenticity have merits and drawbacks. While conforming to societal norms can ensure security and stability, it might stifle personal expression and innovation. On the other hand, adhering to one's true self may bring satisfaction but could create tension with others.
The decision lies with each individual to determine how they want to live their life according to their values and moral standards.
Is the moral worth of a person determined by conformity to norms or by fidelity to authenticity?
The debate over whether a person's moral value is dependent on adherence to societal norms or genuine expression of one's values has been around for centuries. Some argue that individuals who follow society's standards are more likely to be accepted and respected as moral people, while others assert that those who stand up for their beliefs even when they go against the grain exhibit greater integrity and virtue.