Performance has been used to convey knowledge and understanding for centuries, but can it also be used to explore queerness? Queer performance is an umbrella term for any type of artistic expression that celebrates non-normative gender identities, sexual orientations, or romantic attractions. It encompasses everything from drag shows to burlesque performances to poetry readings. Some scholars argue that queer performance can be a valuable epistemic practice because it allows individuals to express their experiences in ways that are meaningful to them. Others argue that queer performance may have a more limited role in epistemology, such as being a way to challenge dominant narratives about queerness. This paper will examine how methodological and ethical concerns intersect with queer performance as an epistemic practice, exploring whether it can legitimately be considered one.
Methodological Concerns
One methodological concern is whether queer performance can produce new knowledge or insights into queer identity. Critics argue that queer performance lacks scientific rigor, relying too much on subjective experience rather than objective observation.
Proponents argue that queer performance can provide unique perspectives on queer life by challenging normative understandings of gender and sexuality.
A drag show might offer insight into what it means to live outside traditional masculine/feminine roles, while a burlesque performance could explore the intersection between body image and desire.
Some queer performers use their work to challenge oppressive structures, such as racism or heteronormativity. By doing so, they create new understandings of queer identity that go beyond individual lived experiences.
Ethical Considerations
Another consideration is the ethical implications of using queer performance for research purposes. Performances often involve intimate interactions between participants, raising questions about consent and privacy. It can also be difficult to ensure that all participants are treated equally during a performance, especially if there are power dynamics at play (such as race, class, or gender). Queer performers must balance these concerns with the need to tell their stories honestly and authentically. Some scholars argue that queer performance should be used only in conjunction with other methods, such as surveys or interviews, to avoid compromising the integrity of research. Others argue that queer performance can stand alone as a valid epistemic practice, provided it is conducted with care and sensitivity.
Queer performance has the potential to be an important epistemic practice, but methodological and ethical considerations must be taken into account. While some may view queer performance as lacking scientific rigor, others see it as providing unique perspectives on queerness that cannot be obtained through more objective approaches.
Performers must navigate complex issues around consent, privacy, and power to ensure that everyone involved feels safe and respected.
Whether queer performance can be considered a legitimate epistemic practice depends on how well those concerns are addressed.