Taboos within taboo refer to the rules and regulations governing what can be discussed and explored within the realm of sexuality and intimacy. Despite its open approach, Taboo had editorial limits that prevented it from publishing certain types of content that would cross legal or ethical boundaries. For example, any form of non-consensual behavior, such as rape or abuse, was strictly prohibited. This included stories that glorified or romanticized these acts, even if they were presented as part of a larger narrative. Similarly, stories that promoted unsafe sex practices were also off-limits, including those that involved risk-taking behaviors like unprotected sex or BDSM without proper consent. In order to maintain this boundary, Taboo employed editors who were well-versed in all aspects of the subject matter being covered, and worked closely with authors to ensure their work adhered to the publication's standards. While some readers may have found this limiting, others appreciated the clarity and respectful tone of the magazine, which offered a safe space for exploration while still upholding basic ethical guidelines.
Despite its commitment to transparency and honesty, Taboo did not shy away from addressing controversial topics related to sexuality and gender. The magazine tackled issues such as polyamory, kink, fetishes, and alternative relationships head-on, providing insights into how different people navigate these dynamics and offering practical advice on how to do so safely and consensually. However, there were still areas where the magazine drew lines, such as when discussing incest or pedophilia. While some readers might have been interested in learning more about these taboo subjects, Taboo felt it was important to prioritize safety and legality above all else, especially given the potential consequences of misrepresenting these issues. Ultimately, Taboo's editorial limits helped to create an inclusive and welcoming space for diverse perspectives on intimacy and desire, while still ensuring that its content remained within reasonable boundaries.