LGBT Service Members Reconciling Identity Authenticity With Unit Loyalty And Mission Requirements
The military is one of the few institutions where an individual's identity must be subsumed to the group. This means that their personal needs may need to take a backseat to the collective good of the unit.
This can create a dilemma for LGBT service members who are struggling to reconcile their authentic self with the demands of military life. In this article, I will explore how these individuals navigate this balance between identity authenticity and unit loyalty while also meeting mission requirements.
The Military Demands Conformity
From the moment they join the military, service members are expected to follow orders without question and fit into the established system. They undergo extensive training to learn military protocols, jargon, and procedures. Their entire lives become structured around the demands of the military lifestyle, from living arrangements to work schedules. As such, it can be challenging for anyone to maintain their individuality in such a rigid environment.
For LGBT service members, there is an added layer of complexity. Traditionally, the military has been known for its strict adherence to traditional gender roles, which often clashes with LGBT identities. This can make it difficult for LGBT service members to feel comfortable expressing themselves fully, both within the military community and outside of it.
Many face discrimination or even violence based on their sexual orientation or gender identity.
Finding Balance Between Identity And Loyalty
Despite these challenges, many LGBT service members find ways to reconcile their identity with the military's expectations. One approach is to compartmentalize their personal and professional lives, keeping them separate as much as possible. Some may choose to only share their true selves with close friends or family members outside of the military. Others may adopt a persona that hides their true identity until they leave the military altogether.
In addition to these strategies, some LGBT service members seek out supportive communities within the military itself. Many branches have created groups specifically for LGBT service members, where they can connect with others who understand their experiences. These groups provide a safe space to discuss issues related to sexuality, gender identity, and military life without fear of reprisal or judgment. They also offer resources like mental health services and legal assistance when needed.
Meeting Mission Requirements
Mission requirements are still paramount in the military. Every member must be willing and able to fulfill their duties, regardless of their personal beliefs or desires. As such, LGBT service members must balance their individual needs with those of the unit. This means putting aside certain preferences or identities when necessary, such as during deployments or training exercises.
An LGBT soldier may need to dress in uniform and perform in a way that aligns with traditional gender roles, even if it feels uncomfortable. Similarly, an LGBT officer might need to maintain a straight-laced demeanor while leading troops on missions.
Many LGBT service members find ways to express themselves creatively through other means, such as artistic pursuits or community involvement.
Balancing one's identity and mission requirements is never easy, but it becomes especially challenging for LGBT service members in the military. By finding supportive networks, compartmentalizing personal and professional lives, and prioritizing mission requirements, these individuals can navigate this delicate balance successfully.
Their contributions to the military remain essential to the success of its operations, despite any personal costs.
How do LGBT service members reconcile identity authenticity with unit loyalty and mission requirements?
LGBT service members may experience internal conflict between their personal identities and military values such as teamwork, obedience, and discipline. This can lead to feelings of isolation and dissonance. To navigate this challenge, they must prioritize their needs for community support and acceptance while balancing their commitment to the military mission.