Queerness is the state of being different from what is socially accepted as normal or traditional. It includes homosexuality, bisexuality, transgenderism, pansexuality, nonbinary gender identities, polyamory, kink, BDSM, and more. Spiritual traditions have historically rejected these behaviors as immoral or sinful. But some argue that they can be reconciled with spiritual teachings through interpretation or reinterpretation.
Others believe that this compromise would destroy the moral coherence of the tradition. Can queerness be embraced without losing its morality?
Argument 1: Queerness is innate and natural, so it must fit within spiritual traditions
Some proponents of LGBTQ+ rights argue that queerness is an inherent part of human nature. This view holds that people are born gay, lesbian, or transgender and cannot change their sexual orientation or identity. Therefore, if God created humans, He/She/They also created them to be queer. Since everything in nature has a purpose, queerness must be included in spiritual traditions as a legitimate expression of divinity.
Argument 2: Moral teachings should adapt to changing society
Traditional religious values are based on societal norms that no longer apply today.
Many religions condemn polygamy because it was taboo in ancient cultures but acceptable in Islamic ones. If we allow for such exceptions, why not extend that tolerance to other forms of sexuality and relationships? The world is becoming increasingly diverse, so spiritual teachings need to evolve accordingly.
Argument 3: Moral teaching is absolute, and queerness violates it
Moral teachings are universal principles applicable across time and culture. Sexual behavior has been seen as immoral since the beginning of recorded history. It goes against the order of creation and destroys families, which are essential for reproduction and social stability. Any attempt to accommodate queerness would undermine traditional family structures and moral standards, leading to chaos and disorder.
Can spiritual traditions evolve to embrace queerness without losing their moral coherence?
Spirituality is not static but rather it changes over time. It has always been influenced by cultural shifts and societal norms. Spiritual tradition can change to embrace queerness without losing its moral coherence as long as it does not abandon its core values. Moral coherence refers to ethical principles that are consistent with one's belief system. These principles may include compassion, honesty, generosity, respect for life, etc.