The role of religion has been essential in framing sexual restraint as an exercise of power, control, dominance, and oppression since ancient times. Religious authorities have consistently promoted the idea that it is necessary to restrict individual behavior for the sake of their God(s), society, or morality. This approach has been justified through various forms of dogma, doctrine, and theology, which are designed to establish moral boundaries between what is permitted and what is prohibited.
The concept of religious authority goes beyond merely prescribing restrictions; it also involves creating a system whereby individuals are expected to abide by these rules without questioning them. Such systems often present themselves as "holy" or "divine," making it difficult for people to challenge them.
Sexual restraint as freedom implies that individuals can make choices about when, how, and with whom they engage in sexual activity, free from social pressures or external interference. While this may seem like a liberating notion, it must be contextualized within the broader framework of patriarchy and misogyny that has characterized many religions throughout history. The way in which religious leaders frame sexual restraint as an act of submission is often based on gender roles that place men above women, placing greater emphasis on male desire than female pleasure. Thus, while some may see religious teachings as providing spiritual guidance, others view them as reinforcing harmful social norms that limit personal autonomy.
Religious institutions often claim that sexual restraint leads to personal purity, righteousness, and inner peace.
This framing serves to obscure the fact that such behaviors can lead to feelings of guilt, shame, and self-doubt, especially when practiced in isolation.
It fails to address the complex psychological needs of humans who seek intimacy, connection, and emotional fulfillment through physical expression. In contrast, secular approaches to sex education promote self-knowledge, open communication, and mutual respect, emphasizing consent, pleasure, and safety.
Religious authority has long used dogma and doctrine to impose strict restrictions on sexual behavior. By presenting these rules as necessary for salvation or moral uprightness, they have sought to control individuals' choices and shape their worldview. While there are benefits to abstaining from certain forms of sexual expression, the consequences of doing so should not be ignored. Instead, we must strive towards a society where individuals are free to make decisions about their own bodies and relationships without fear of judgment or censure.