We will examine how internalized hierarchies impact how soldiers interpret emotional cues from their superiors versus their peers.
It is important to understand that internalized hierarchies are socially constructed systems that dictate who has power and authority within a given context. In the military, these hierarchies are often based on rank and experience, with higher-ranking individuals having more power than lower-ranking ones. This can lead to subordinates feeling pressure to conform to the expectations of their superiors and avoid challenging them, even if they disagree with their decisions.
Let's consider how these hierarchies influence emotional cues. When receiving instructions or feedback from a superior, soldiers may be more likely to read between the lines and attempt to discern subtle emotions that could indicate approval or disapproval.
A commanding officer might say "good job" while conveying through body language that they are actually dissatisfied. Subordinates may also struggle to express their own feelings in front of someone with greater power or authority, fearful of reprisal or punishment for disagreement. In contrast, when communicating with peers, there is often less concern about hierarchy and more freedom to express opinions openly. This can create an environment where soldiers feel safe to share their true thoughts and emotions without fear of retaliation.
Internalized hierarchies can shape how soldiers interpret nonverbal communication such as facial expressions and tone of voice.
A superior giving praise may use exaggerated positive tones or smiles to convey sincerity, but this could be misinterpreted by a subordinate who lacks familiarity with this kind of interaction. Similarly, a peer's sarcastic comment could be taken as genuine camaraderie, whereas a superior's sarcasm might be interpreted as criticism. These misunderstandings can have serious consequences, leading to conflicts or even physical altercations.
Internalized hierarchies can also impact how soldiers process trauma or stress during combat situations. When faced with high-stakes decisions or difficult conditions, superiors may try to suppress emotional responses for the sake of maintaining order or appearing strong. Meanwhile, peers may provide support and empathy, allowing them to work together to find solutions. This dynamic can result in feelings of isolation and loneliness among leaders, while creating a sense of community among lower ranks.
These differences in emotional interpretation highlight the need for improved communication training and awareness within military units to reduce misunderstandings and promote cooperation.
How do internalized hierarchies influence soldiers' interpretation of emotional cues from superiors versus peers?
Due to the internalization of military hierarchy, soldiers may interpret emotional cues differently depending on whether they are given by their superior or peer. When it comes to negative emotions such as anger or frustration, soldiers might be more likely to attribute them to their superior than to their peer because they perceive that their superior has the authority to express these feelings.