Queer Censorship is defined as the act of limiting, controlling, and excluding certain types of queer expression that does not conform to the normative standards set up by society. This can take various forms such as censoring LGBTQ+ media, art, literature, performances, websites, and even social media posts. Forms of queer censorship have been around for centuries but have become more prevalent in recent times due to advancements in technology and social media platforms.
Algorithmic Censorship refers to the process whereby search engines, social media platforms, and other internet services filter out content based on keywords or patterns. Queer content is often flagged as "inappropriate" or "offensive," making it difficult to find online.
TikTok has recently removed videos tagged with specific words like "gay" from their platform's algorithm, thereby suppressing queer representation and visibility.
Institutional Censorship happens when institutions restrict access to information related to sexuality and gender identities. Examples include blocking educational materials from libraries, banning books containing queer themes from schools, and shutting down LGBTQ+ organizations. Institutional censorship also includes laws against same-sex marriage, adoption, and surrogacy, which hinder queer people's ability to build families.
Social Mechanisms involve pressure groups seeking to maintain traditional ideas about gender roles, sexual orientation, and relationships. These mechanisms manifest through shaming, bullying, harassment, and violence towards anyone who challenges these ideologies. Transphobia, homophobia, biphobia, and heterosexism are all examples of social mechanisms used to silence queer voices.
Counterâ€'Technologies are methods that counteract the effects of queer censorship by providing a safe space for queer expression and representation. This includes online communities such as Tumblr, Discord, and Reddit, where users can discuss queer topics without fear of being censored or reprimanded. It also involves using codewords and emojis to communicate subtly while avoiding explicit language.
Alternative Platforms offer an alternative way to share queer content outside of mainstream media outlets. Examples include websites, podcasts, and blogs run by queer individuals and allies. They promote self-expression, community building, and activism, allowing queer voices to be heard even in hostile environments.
Networked Sovereignty is a concept whereby queer people create their networks to protect themselves from censorship and oppression. This means creating support systems and advocating for policies that promote inclusivity and diversity. It may also mean establishing independent networks free from corporate control or government interference.
Queer Censorship operates through algorithmic, institutional, and social mechanisms that limit queer expression and representation. Future queer publics can develop counterâ€'technologies, alternative platforms, and networked sovereignty to resist censorship and promote visibility. By doing so, they can build resilient communities that empower marginalized groups and challenge societal norms.
How do forms of queer censorship operate through algorithmic, institutional, and social mechanisms, and how might future queer publics develop counter‑technologies, alternative platforms, and networked sovereignty?
Queer censorship operates through various means such as algorithmic, institutional, and social mechanisms. Algorithmic censorship involves the use of artificial intelligence algorithms that can detect and block content that contains sensitive words related to queerness. Institutional censorship refers to the policies and procedures implemented by organizations such as schools, workplaces, and governments that prohibit the discussion of LGBTQ+ topics.