The Impact of Historical Context on Contemporary Policies for Inclusivity of LGBTQ+ Individuals in Armed Forces
The issue of inclusivity of LGBTQ+ individuals in armed forces has been a controversial one that continues to elicit mixed reactions from both sides. The debate is more intense due to the historical context that surrounds it.
The military environment of the past was characterized by patriarchal norms where homosexuality was frowned upon as unnatural and immoral. This perspective shaped the military policy on inclusion of gay people within its ranks.
Since then, there have been significant changes in the society's perception towards this group.
From Exclusion to Partial Acceptance
In previous years, gay people were excluded from serving in military because they were considered weaklings who could easily be blackmailed or compromised into sharing classified information. The US Army rejected openly gay people during the Second World War and the Korean War, but tolerated those who concealed their sexual orientation. During this time, the army had no clear policy on how to handle gays, which resulted in witch-hunts. Consequently, many gay soldiers were discharged due to their sexual orientation.
Military Policy Reforms
Despite the discriminatory policies of the past, attitudes have changed significantly over the years, leading to reforms in the military policy. In 1993, President Bill Clinton signed a law prohibiting discrimination against gays in the military. As a result, LGBTQ+ members were allowed to serve openly without fear of being dismissed. The Don't Ask Don't Tell (DADT) policy also helped to reduce discrimination while allowing gay individuals to serve in the armed forces. Nonetheless, under DADT, gay people had to keep their sexual identity secret, making it difficult for them to integrate fully into the military culture.
Impact of Historical Context on Contemporary Policies
The historical context has played an integral role in shaping contemporary policies regarding inclusion of gays in the military.
The patriarchal norms of the past that viewed homosexuality as unnatural and immoral still influence the perception of some people towards gays. This is despite the fact that most militaries today recognize and respect diversity in all forms.
There are still challenges such as resistance from conservative groups, lack of understanding among heterosexuals about the importance of inclusivity, and difficulties in integrating LGBTQ+ individuals into military units.
The historical context influences contemporary policies on inclusion of gays in the military. Although attitudes have changed considerably, there are still cultural biases and institutional obstacles that must be overcome. Nevertheless, the trend towards inclusivity is positive, and the future holds hope for more acceptance and integration of LGBTQ+ individuals into the military.
How does historical context influence contemporary policies on LGBT inclusion in armed forces?
History has shown that LGBT individuals have faced significant discrimination within military institutions due to their sexual orientation and gender identity. This discrimination is rooted in cultural norms and beliefs that deem LGBT individuals as lesser than heterosexual and cisgender persons. As a result, policy makers have implemented various measures aimed at excluding them from service or restricting their rights within the military.