What is Moral Reasoning?
Moral reasoning refers to how individuals make decisions based on their ethical beliefs, values, and principles. It involves assessing the morality of an action based on its consequences and considering the potential effects it may have on oneself and others. Through lived experience, individuals develop a unique set of moral beliefs that guide their actions and decision-making processes. This process can be influenced by various factors such as cultural background, upbringing, education, and personal experiences.
How does Marginalization affect Moral Reasoning?
Individuals who are marginalized due to their sexual orientation or gender identity often face discrimination, prejudice, and exclusion from society. These experiences can lead to feelings of isolation, shame, and anxiety, which can impact their moral development.
They may question their own worthiness and value and doubt their ability to live authentically. As a result, they may become more cautious about expressing themselves openly and engaging in relationships for fear of rejection or harm. They may also struggle with guilt, self-blame, and doubt, leading to a decrease in self-esteem and confidence.
How does Resilience help Marginalized Individuals Develop Moral Reasoning?
Despite these challenges, marginalized individuals often demonstrate remarkable resilience. They learn to navigate social environments while maintaining a sense of pride, dignity, and integrity. Their lived experiences provide them with insights into the nature of oppression and injustice, inspiring them to challenge societal norms and advocate for change. By developing a strong sense of agency, they empower themselves to take control of their lives and make choices based on their values rather than external pressures.
Examples of LGBT People's Moral Reasoning through Experience
Lived experience has shaped the moral reasoning of many LGBT individuals. One individual shared how their upbringing taught them that homosexuality was wrong and sinful, but their personal experiences helped them realize that it was not a choice. Another explained how their journey toward acceptance involved recognizing the importance of honesty and authenticity in all aspects of life. A third individual spoke of learning to prioritize their mental health and well-being over conformity, even if it meant facing criticism from others.
How does moral reasoning evolve through lived experience of marginalization and resilience among LGBT people?
In their research on gay men's experiences with HIV/AIDS, Chase (2018) found that as they faced health challenges, some individuals underwent an existential crisis, experiencing profound doubt about life purpose, while others responded by developing newfound strength and appreciation for life. These contrasting responses suggest that individual differences may shape how moral reasoning develops through lived experience.