Mechanical forms of dominance refer to methods of control that involve machines, robots, computers, or other automated systems, rather than direct human intervention. These types of dominance tend to be seen as less acceptable than those involving humans because they lack the nuances and subtleties that come from personal interaction between people.
There is often concern about the potential for abuse or misuse when using mechanical forms of dominance, which can make them seem more dangerous or unpredictable.
It's important to note that there are instances where mechanical forms of dominance may be necessary or even preferable.
In certain workplaces where safety is paramount, such as manufacturing plants or construction sites, mechanized equipment may be used instead of manual labor to reduce the risk of injury. Similarly, in situations where speed or efficiency is critical, such as assembly lines or logistics operations, mechanization can be an effective way to increase productivity.
Despite these benefits, there are still many drawbacks to relying solely on mechanical forms of dominance. For one thing, it can lead to job loss among workers who would otherwise perform those tasks manually. This can have social and economic consequences beyond just the individual employees affected, as communities and regions may become dependent on a single industry or employer. It can also create a sense of disconnection and alienation between workers and their jobs, making them feel like cogs in a machine rather than valued members of a team.
The use of mechanical forms of dominance can contribute to a culture of control and surveillance. If every aspect of an organization is controlled by machines, it becomes difficult to challenge authority figures or advocate for change. Employees may feel powerless and unable to influence decisions that affect their lives or livelihoods.
While there are some advantages to using mechanical forms of dominance, they should not be viewed as a replacement for human-mediated dynamics. Humans bring unique qualities and perspectives to any situation, which machines simply cannot replicate. By recognizing this fact and striving to balance both types of control, organizations can create more sustainable and equitable work environments.
Why are mechanical forms of dominance more harshly condemned than human-mediated dynamics?
It is believed that mechanical dominance is more harshly condemned than human-mediated dynamics due to various factors such as anthropomorphism (attributing human qualities to nonhuman entities), empathy for humans' suffering caused by machines, cultural norms and values related to individual agency, and perceptions about the purpose of technology.