The notion that competitiveness can be beneficial or detrimental in certain circumstances has been a subject of intense debate among philosophers. In this essay, I will discuss how the concept of competition is applied in situations where it saves or costs lives. To begin with, one must examine the meaning of "competition". According to Dictionary.com, it refers to an interaction between individuals or groups striving for superiority over each other. This idea implies that someone's success depends upon another person's failure. It may involve physical or mental activities such as athletics, business, politics, education, or arts. The word originates from Latin "conpetere," which means "to seek together." Thus, it signifies a mutual effort towards achieving a specific goal without considering the negative consequences for others.
In a real-world setting, people often feel threatened when they perceive themselves as inferior compared to their peers. They may become more aggressive, ruthless, and unethical to gain an advantage.
Some students are so competitive that they cheat during exams or plagiarize assignments just to outperform others.
This behavior harms both the individual and society by lowering academic standards. Similarly, politicians might employ unfair tactics to win elections at any cost. They could spread false information or slander opponents, thus misleading voters and undermining democracy. Competitors sometimes disregard safety measures to reach their goals faster, putting themselves and others at risk.
Competition can have positive effects if used correctly. Athletes compete to improve fitness levels and push boundaries while observing fair play rules. Scientists engage in healthy rivalry to discover new things and advance human knowledge. Business owners compete on equal terms with rivals to offer better products and services. These instances promote innovation, creativity, and progress.
Cooperation between individuals is possible even within competitive contexts. Sports teams train together to achieve collective success; research laboratories collaborate on projects with similar objectives; businesses learn from each other's mistakes.
I conclude that competition has both advantages and drawbacks depending on how it is applied. It should not be seen as inherently good or bad but rather as a tool for achieving specific purposes. People must evaluate its impact before using it in certain situations where it may save or cost lives.
What philosophical tensions emerge when comparing oneself to others in environments where competition may save or cost lives?
The question asks about the philosophical tension that arises when people compare themselves to each other in competitive situations where one's success can be life-changing for better or worse. This comparison often leads to feelings of envy and jealousy, as well as pride and satisfaction. On the one hand, people may feel motivated to work harder and do their best to achieve greater outcomes than others around them.