Logo

ZeroOpposite

Contact Us
Search

RELATIONAL TRUST: HOW IT IMPACTS INTIMATE RELATIONSHIPS & OUR UNDERSTANDING OF OURSELVES.

Relational Trust

Relational trust refers to the belief that another person will act according to shared expectations and values even when there are opportunities for deception. It can be defined as "a psychological state consisting of the intention to accept vulnerability based upon positive expectations of the intentions or behavior of another." In other words, it is the willingness to expose oneself to potential harm because one believes that the other person will not take advantage of the situation.

Philosophical Debates on Authenticity

Philosophers have debated the concept of authenticity for centuries. One approach to understanding authenticity is to see it as a virtue that involves being true to oneself. This view argues that individuals should strive to live according to their own internal values and desires rather than conforming to external pressures from society or others.

This definition raises questions about how we determine what is genuine and authentic. Is authenticity something inherent within an individual, or is it shaped by social norms and expectations?

The Authenticity Paradox

Some philosophers argue that authenticity cannot exist without relational trust.

Hannah Arendt argued that authenticity requires a degree of detachment from the world in order to achieve self-awareness.

She also believed that individuals need to engage with others in order to develop their authentic selves. This leads to what she called the "authenticity paradox": We must both withdraw into ourselves and connect with others in order to find our authentic selves.

Freedom and Moral Duty

Many philosophers have explored the relationship between freedom and duty. One way to understand this relationship is through the idea of "moral luck," which suggests that moral actions are not always completely under our control. We may act morally even when there is no obligation to do so, but sometimes we may act immorally due to factors beyond our control. Relational trust can play a role in this debate by allowing us to make choices based on shared expectations and beliefs, rather than simply acting out of habit or instinct.

Kantian Perspective

Immanuel Kant believed that moral action was based on reason and universal rules. He argued that we should treat others as ends in themselves, not merely means to an end. In other words, we should respect their autonomy and not use them for our own benefit.

He also argued that we should act according to duty, even if it conflicts with our desires or inclinations. This view highlights the importance of trust in relationships, since it allows us to act based on shared values and expectations rather than individual impulses.

Authenticity and Freedom

Philosophers have debated whether authenticity is compatible with freedom. Some argue that genuine self-expression requires breaking free from social norms and expectations. Others suggest that authenticity requires acceptance of social constraints and limitations.

Jean-Paul Sartre believed that individuals create their own reality through their actions, while Simone de Beauvoir suggested that individuals must resist societal pressures to be truly free.

Relational trust can help us navigate these tensions by creating a safe space where we feel secure enough to express ourselves fully without fear of judgment or repercussions. When we trust another person, we are more likely to take risks and try new things, which may lead to greater personal growth and development.

Relational trust plays a crucial role in philosophical debates about authenticity, freedom, and moral duty. It allows us to make choices based on shared values and beliefs, rather than simply reacting to external pressures or impulses. Trust helps us connect with others and find common ground, allowing us to explore ideas and concepts more deeply and meaningfully.

It is important to remember that relational trust is not always automatic - it takes time, effort, and vulnerability to build and maintain.

How does relational trust interact with philosophical debates on authenticity, freedom, and moral duty?

Relational trust is an essential component of interpersonal communication that involves mutual reliance between two individuals based on the belief that their partner will act in their best interest and not intentionally harm them (Nadler & Tushman, 1980). It has been conceptualized as a core element of human nature and a fundamental building block for social relationships, including friendships, romantic partnerships, family ties, and professional collaborations (Mayer et al.

#authenticity#relationaltrust#philosophy#psychology#society#ethics#morality