Programmable submission devices are objects that have been designed to elicit a response from people, usually through the stimulation of their bodies and emotions. They can be used for various purposes, such as enhancing romantic experiences, improving sexual encounters, or creating artistic works.
These devices also reveal underlying power dynamics within intimate and cultural spaces that might otherwise remain unseen. In this article, we will explore how programmable submission devices illuminate hidden societal hierarchies related to gender, race, class, age, ability, and more.
Let's consider how programmable submission devices reflect social norms around gender roles. Many popular devices are marketed towards men, who are assumed to enjoy receiving pleasure through submissive activities like bondage, spanking, and choking. These devices often emphasize male dominance and female submission, reinforcing harmful stereotypes about masculinity and femininity.
One common device is the cock cage, which prevents erections in men while they engage in BDSM play. This object implies that women should be "trained" to satisfy men sexually and reinforces patriarchal ideals about male entitlement.
Some manufacturers create female-specific versions of devices, perpetuating the idea that women need to be passive and obey their partners' desires.
Programmable submission devices can reflect racial hierarchies by suggesting that certain groups are more dominant or submissive than others. Some devices have racially charged names, like "black dildo," which suggests that Black people are inherently more aggressive or animalistic than other races. Others use specific materials or colors to evoke particular associations with race.
A butt plug made from stainless steel may suggest strength and power, while a pink vibrator might evoke ideas about femininity and sexuality. This can reinforce racist beliefs about who deserves pleasure and who does not.
Classism is another way that programmable submission devices reveal societal hierarchies. While some objects are explicitly luxury items, others are designed for everyday use. The price point alone can indicate class differences, as lower-income individuals may feel excluded from purchasing high-end devices.
The materials used in these products can signal wealth, with gold, leather, and silicone being seen as status symbols.
A $1000 flogger made from genuine leather could communicate social status and wealth far better than a $30 one made from plastic. Moreover, expensive toys often include intricate patterns or designs, indicating refined taste and culture.
Ageism also plays into how programmable submission devices illuminate societal hierarchies. Many of these products target younger audiences and market themselves as a rite of passage. They imply that older generations should be less sexually active and less interested in experimentation, perpetuating ageist stereotypes. Similarly, these products can assume that youthfulness equals sexual prowess, which can exclude older adults who still enjoy BDSM or kinky play.
Programmable submission devices reflect ableist ideals by suggesting that certain bodies are more desirable than others. Some devices have physical limitations, such as not being usable by people with mobility issues or disabilities. Others require specific body types, such as those who can take large objects inside them safely. This can further exclude marginalized groups from enjoying kinky activities or exploring their own pleasure.
Programmable submission devices reveal hidden societal hierarchies related to gender, race, class, age, ability, and more. These objects reinforce harmful beliefs about dominance, power, and worthiness, excluding many individuals from fully participating in sexual exploration. As we continue to use these devices, it is crucial for consumers to consider how they contribute to systemic oppression and work towards creating more inclusive and equitable spaces.
How do programmable submission devices illuminate hidden societal hierarchies within intimate and cultural spaces?
Programmable submission devices are tools that allow individuals to submit to authority figures, institutions, or social norms in various ways. These devices may include software, hardware, or physical objects that require users to follow specific rules or commands from external sources. By submitting to these programs, people can reveal their position in society as submissive or powerless.