Logo

ZeroOpposite

Contact Us
Search

HOW EMOTIONAL SUPPRESSION CAN AFFECT SOLDIERS WELLBEING AND UNIT COHESION

Soldiers are often expected to be stoic and self-controlled, especially when facing difficult situations such as combat or high-stress environments.

They are also human beings who may experience a range of emotions, including fear, anger, sadness, joy, frustration, and love. These feelings can affect their decision-making processes and impact their interactions with others. The fear of being judged or gossiped about for showing emotions can lead soldiers to suppress their feelings, which may have negative consequences for themselves and those around them. This article will explore how this phenomenon plays out in the context of military service and the potential ramifications it has on individual wellbeing and unit cohesion.

One study found that soldiers who experienced traumatic events during deployment were more likely to report avoiding expressing emotions, compared to those who did not experience trauma. They reported feeling ashamed, embarrassed, or guilty about expressing their feelings, which could contribute to long-term mental health issues like depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Another study found that soldiers who expressed positive emotions in the field had better physical and psychological health outcomes than those who did not. It is possible that repressed emotions can build up and cause harmful effects, whereas expressing emotions can help relieve tension and promote resilience.

Social norms around emotion expression also play a role in shaping soldiers' choices. Many cultures view men as stoic and unemotional, while women are expected to be more openly emotional. Soldiers may feel pressure to conform to these gender roles or risk being perceived as weak or feminine. This can make it difficult for men to show vulnerability or seek support when they need it, leading to isolation and increased risk for suicide. For women, there is often less stigma around expressing emotions, but they may still face backlash if they display too much sentimentality or "unfeminine" behavior.

The fear of gossip or social scrutiny can lead soldiers to suppress their emotions, both positive and negative. They may worry that others will judge them for crying, laughing, or showing other signs of distress. This can prevent them from getting the support they need or sharing information that could improve unit cohesion and performance. It can also create an atmosphere where only certain types of emotions are acceptable or encouraged, which can lead to groupthink and reduced creativity.

To counteract this phenomenon, military leaders and healthcare providers should encourage open communication and expression of all feelings, including anger, frustration, grief, and joy. Leaders can model empathy and emotional intelligence by acknowledging their own feelings and listening to those of subordinates. Healthcare providers can provide resources on how to manage emotions productively and access mental health services without shame.

The fear of gossip or social scrutiny can have significant effects on soldiers' choices regarding emotional expression. By understanding these pressures, we can promote resilience and improve outcomes for individuals and units alike.

How does the fear of gossip or social scrutiny influence soldiers' choices regarding emotional expression?

The fear of gossip or social scrutiny can have a significant impact on soldiers' choices regarding their emotional expression during combat situations. Soldiers may be reluctant to express their feelings openly due to the potential for criticism from peers or superiors who may view such behavior as weakness or vulnerability. This can lead to suppressed emotions that could potentially negatively affect the mental health of individual soldiers, which can hinder their overall performance and effectiveness in battle.

#militarylife#soldieremotions#mentalhealthmatters#unitcohesion#psychology#selfcare#wellbeing