Soldiers are trained to be independent individuals who can function effectively under pressure and stressful situations. They must be able to make quick decisions and act alone without the help of others.
During combat, they often rely heavily on their teammates for support and guidance. This can create tension between the desire for independence and the need for interdependence. In this article, I will explore how soldiers reconcile these conflicting needs in the field.
Let's look at how soldiers develop relational dependence. Soldiers spend extended periods of time living and working closely together, forming bonds that go beyond just comradeship. These relationships become essential sources of comfort and support when things get tough. The close quarters and intense situations that characterize military life create a sense of intimacy that is difficult to find elsewhere. Soldiers become deeply invested in each other's wellbeing and feel responsible for one another's safety.
Soldiers also have to maintain their own mental stability and emotional resilience. They cannot afford to rely too heavily on others because doing so can affect their performance on the battlefield. To counterbalance this, they must cultivate a strong sense of self-reliance. They must believe in themselves and trust their abilities to succeed even when faced with danger or difficulty. They must stay alert and focused, ready to take action without hesitation.
How do soldiers strike a balance between relational dependence and psychological independence? One strategy is to use their team as a resource but not an anchor. They draw strength from one another while still remaining firmly rooted in their own convictions and capabilities.
They might seek advice and feedback from fellow soldiers but ultimately make decisions based on their personal beliefs and experiences.
Another strategy is to view interdependence as complementary rather than contradictory. When soldiers recognize that their success depends on collaboration, they can embrace it without compromising their individuality. They see themselves as part of a larger whole and celebrate the diversity of perspectives and skills within their group. This creates a cohesive unit where everyone works together towards shared goals.
Soldiers learn to navigate the tension between relational dependence and psychological independence by recognizing the value of both. By embracing interdependence and practicing self-reliance simultaneously, they become more effective and resilient combatants. As they grow closer to their teammates, they also deepen their commitment to protecting each other and achieving mission objectives.
How do soldiers reconcile relational dependence with the psychological need for self-reliance in combat contexts?
In order to understand how soldiers can reconcile relational dependence with the psychological need for self-reliance in combat contexts, it is important to explore the complex dynamics of soldiering and the various factors that shape these attitudes and behaviors. One approach to understanding this issue is through the lens of attachment theory, which posits that human beings have an innate need for closeness and intimacy with others, yet also experience anxiety when they are dependent on others.