Religious Leaders Justify Changes in Sexual Doctrine Over Time
Sexual morality is an important aspect of religion that dictates what is acceptable and what is unacceptable behavior between people who have different genders.
According to Christianity, premarital sex is considered sinful. But, for centuries, many Christians ignored this rule because it was impractical to abide by it. In modern times, churches are more lenient about this issue. This change can be justified by religious leaders using various approaches.
One approach that has been used to justify changes in sexual doctrine is historical context. The Bible was written during a time when marriage between men and women was expected.
Society has changed since then. Today, some religions allow same-sex marriages. Some even recognize polygamy. So, religious leaders explain that these changes reflect the changing times. They say that God's will may still apply but His expectations have evolved.
Another way that religious leaders justify changes in sexual doctrine is through interpretation. Different scriptures may conflict, so interpreters must make sense of them.
One verse might say that adultery is wrong while another says that widows should remarry. Interpreters argue that context matters. Therefore, they determine which interpretation is most accurate.
Religious leaders also use logic to justify changes in sexual doctrine.
They may point out that certain sins are harmful to society. Adultery can cause emotional trauma and divorce. These consequences negatively impact children and communities. Religious leaders may conclude that adultery isn't worth promoting despite its inclusion in the Ten Commandments.
Some religious leaders seek medical advice from experts. Modern science explains how humans are born with different desires. It also sheds light on sexual behavior. Thus, religious leaders acknowledge that people have natural urges, including lust. Rather than repress those impulses, they encourage healthy relationships. This justifies their shift in sexual doctrine over time.