Service members face many challenges while deployed abroad. They must adapt to new environments, learn how to work together with colleagues from different cultures and backgrounds, maintain their physical fitness, and stay focused on the mission despite the chaos around them. It is also essential for them to develop strong interpersonal skills, particularly in terms of communicating effectively with superiors, subordinates, and teammates. One aspect that can be crucial during times of extreme stress is emotional support. When under fire, service members may seek out peers who share similar experiences to provide guidance and encouragement.
Evaluating the credibility and authenticity of such support can be tricky. In this article, I will explore how service members evaluate the credibility and authenticity of emotional support offered by peers under extreme stress.
One way service members can evaluate emotional support is by observing body language and tone of voice. If someone offers unsolicited advice or tries to take control of the conversation, it may signal an attempt to manipulate the situation rather than genuinely offer help. Conversely, if someone is willing to listen without judgment or pushback, they are more likely to be trustworthy. Service members should also consider whether the person offering support has relevant experience and knowledge about the specific situation at hand.
A member of Special Forces would not seek advice from a Marine grunt on how to conduct a hostage rescue operation.
Service members should look for signs of empathy, compassion, and understanding when evaluating emotional support. A sympathetic ear or a hug can go a long way towards easing tension and providing comfort.
Another factor service members must consider is timing. Emotional support should never be forced upon someone who does not want it. It should also be given with sensitivity and care, especially if the individual receiving it is in crisis.
Emotional support cannot always be delivered verbally; sometimes physical touch or nonverbal communication is necessary.
Service members must assess whether the source of emotional support has their best interests at heart. Those who offer support solely as part of a transactional relationship (e.g., expecting something in return) should be viewed skeptically.
While emotional support can be crucial during times of stress, service members must carefully evaluate its credibility and authenticity before accepting it.
How do service members evaluate the credibility and authenticity of emotional support offered by peers under extreme stress?
According to research on intergroup communication, individuals tend to assess others' behaviors based on their perceptions of shared group membership. In times of crisis and high stress, such as combat zones, military personnel may seek out emotional support from fellow service members who are perceived as being part of their ingroup (i. e. , other soldiers).