The concept of bisexual erasure refers to the phenomenon whereby bisexuals are ignored, dismissed, invalidated, or denied recognition in discussions about sexuality, often resulting in their experiences being silenced and minimized. This can take place within various settings, such as academia, social justice movements, and interpersonal relationships. Bisexual erasure is problematic because it has significant implications for those who identify as bisexual, including the possibility of harmful psychological effects, and limits opportunities for visibility and representation. It also reinforces harmful stereotypes and misconceptions surrounding bisexuality, which can perpetuate stigma and discrimination against this group. The purpose of this essay is to explore how bisexual erasure functions as a form of epistemic violence in both academia and activism. In particular, it will examine the ways that the exclusion of bisexual identities from research and advocacy work can lead to negative outcomes for bisexual individuals, as well as the broader society.
Examples of Bisexual Erasure in Academia
In academic contexts, bisexual erasure occurs when researchers ignore, downplay, or exclude evidence related to bisexuality, thereby rendering it invisible and unimportant.
Studies that focus exclusively on monosexual (i.e., hetero- or homosexual) identities may fail to account for the unique experiences and needs of bisexual people, potentially leading to biased conclusions or overgeneralizations. Similarly, researchers who do not recognize bisexuality as legitimate can dismiss findings that support its existence, even if they are robust and credible. This type of erasure can be seen in various fields, such as sexual health, mental health, and sociology.
Impacts of Bisexual Erasure
The consequences of bisexual erasure in academia can be significant, particularly in terms of social justice and inclusivity. When bisexual perspectives are excluded from research, scholars cannot fully understand the complexities and nuances of sexual identity, which can limit their ability to address relevant issues effectively.
Failure to acknowledge bisexual identities contributes to a culture of stigma and discrimination, perpetuating stereotypes and prejudices against bisexuals. This can have detrimental effects on bisexual individuals themselves, including increased vulnerability to physical and emotional harm, reduced access to resources and support, and limited opportunities for representation and advocacy.
Examples of Bisexual Erasure in Activism
In activist spaces, bisexual erasure occurs when bisexual concerns and voices are minimized or ignored, thereby denying them recognition and agency.
LGBTQ+ organizations may prioritize other groups (e.g., gay men and lesbians) over bisexuals, thereby marginalizing the latter's experiences and needs.
Bisexual-specific events or initiatives may be neglected or omitted altogether, even though they play an essential role in promoting visibility and understanding of this group. As with academic settings, bi erasure in activism can lead to negative outcomes, such as diminished support and resources for bisexual people, and reinforcement of harmful stereotypes and misconceptions about their identities.
Impacts of Bisexual Erasure in Activism
The consequences of bisexual erasure in activism can be significant. Without adequate representation and recognition, bisexuals may feel isolated, invisible, and unsupported, leading to poor mental health outcomes and decreased participation in social justice work.
Failure to address bisexual issues contributes to a culture of stigma and discrimination, perpetuating negative attitudes towards bisexuals that can have far-reaching effects on society at large.
It is crucial to recognize and address bisexual erasure in both academia and activism to promote inclusivity, social justice, and empowerment for all individuals who identify as bisexual.
How does bisexual erasure function as a form of epistemic violence in both academia and activism?
Bisexual erasure is often used as a way to invalidate the identity of individuals who identify as bisexual. It can also be seen as a form of discrimination against them based on their sexual orientation. This type of erasure has negative consequences for the well-being of bisexual people as it may lead to feelings of isolation and exclusion, which can ultimately affect their mental health.