Political Ideologies Determine Erotic Taboos: What Happens When They're Violated?
The interplay between political ideology and erotic behavior is complex and often controversial. Some political ideologies, such as conservatism, traditionally emphasize traditional gender roles and family values that may include restrictions on certain forms of erotic expression. On the other hand, liberal ideologies tend to promote greater individual freedom and personal autonomy, which can lead to more permissive attitudes towards erotic expression. This article explores how different political ideologies shape societal attitudes towards erotic taboos and examines what happens when these taboos are violated.
Conservative Political Ideology and Erotic Taboos
Conservatives typically believe in maintaining traditional norms and values, including those related to sexuality.
Many conservative cultures view homosexuality or premarital sex as morally wrong and unacceptable. These beliefs are reflected in laws and social norms that discourage or even criminalize these behaviors.
Some conservatives also recognize that people have a right to privacy and individual liberty, so they tolerate some level of non-traditional sexual practices.
While conservative countries like Saudi Arabia may outlaw same-sex relationships, they also allow private parties to host dance clubs where men and women can interact without supervision.
Liberal Political Ideology and Erotic Taboos
Liberals generally support freedom of choice and personal autonomy, so they tend to be less restrictive regarding sexuality than conservatives. They may tolerate or encourage behaviors that are considered taboo by conservatives, such as polygamy, polyamory, and public displays of affection. Some liberals even advocate for legalizing prostitution or decriminalizing marijuana use.
Liberals must balance their commitment to individual rights with the need to protect vulnerable populations, such as children or victims of abuse.
Violating Erotic Taboos: Consequences and Controversies
When individuals break erotic taboos, there can be both positive and negative consequences. On one hand, breaking free from societal restrictions can lead to greater self-expression and fulfillment.
LGBTQ+ individuals who come out may feel more authentic and comfortable in their own skin. But on the other hand, violating taboos can also lead to social stigma, discrimination, and violence.
Homosexuality is still illegal in many countries around the world and can result in imprisonment or even death.
Some people view transgenderism as a mental illness or believe it violates natural law.
The interplay between political ideologies and erotic behavior is nuanced and multifaceted. While some political ideologies promote more permissive attitudes towards erotic expression, others place strict limits on certain forms of intimacy. Breaking these taboos can have both positive and negative consequences, but ultimately, individuals should have the right to choose how they express themselves sexually without fear of judgment or persecution.
How do political ideologies determine which erotic taboos are socially enforced, and what are the consequences when these taboos are violated?
Eric Berne (1954) noted that people's behavior is determined by their "scripts" or patterns of social interaction. He observed how individuals were strongly influenced by their cultural environment, including values and rules. The culture determines which sexual behaviors are considered acceptable and unacceptable, and thus which behaviors should be repressed through internalization. In this context, one can argue that political ideologies play an important role in determining erotic taboos.