As human beings, we have an innate need for love, companionship, and procreation. Surrogacy is a practice that has been around since ancient times but has recently become more popular due to advances in medical technology.
It raises many moral and ethical questions, particularly regarding the rights and obligations of those involved in the process. In this article, we will explore how religious narratives shape moral judgments about bodily autonomy and reproductive ethics related to surrogacy.
The Bible is one example of a religious text that provides guidelines on these issues. It states that God created humans male and female and established their respective roles within marriage, including procreation. According to Genesis 1:28, humans are given dominion over all living things, including reproduction. This means that procreation should occur naturally within marriage between a man and woman. Any deviation from this natural order is considered sinful. This belief system shapes views on surrogacy, where some see it as a violation of God's design for reproduction.
In Islam, there is no specific mention of surrogacy in the Quran or Hadith, but scholars generally agree that it goes against the natural order and is prohibited. The idea of surrogacy is not mentioned in Judaism either, but rabbis have addressed the issue through commentary. Jewish law allows for surrogacy when there is no other option, such as infertility or genetic defects.
This does not apply to non-Jewish couples, who must adopt or use donor sperm instead.
Christianity also takes a similar stance on surrogacy, viewing it as an unnatural practice that disrupts the intended purpose of marriage and childbirth. Some Christians believe that children belong to God and are gifts from Him, making surrogacy unethical. Others argue that surrogacy can be acceptable if it results in birth rather than abortion.
Hinduism has a more nuanced approach, allowing surrogacy under certain circumstances and with proper consent from both parties involved. It recognizes that sometimes there may be medical or practical reasons for surrogacy, so long as it is done ethically and with respect for those involved. Buddhism also accepts surrogacy under certain conditions, emphasizing compassion for all living things.
Atheists, on the other hand, tend to take a neutral stance towards surrogacy, focusing on individual choice and personal beliefs. They often see it as a private matter and do not impose their views on others. This perspective allows individuals to make decisions based on their own values and experiences without religious influence.
While religion plays a significant role in shaping moral judgments about bodily autonomy and reproductive ethics related to surrogacy, it is not always consistent across different faiths. Each faith has its unique interpretations and teachings that inform these attitudes.
Each person's views should be respected, and they should have the freedom to choose what works best for them.
How do religious narratives surrounding surrogacy shape moral judgments about bodily autonomy and reproductive ethics?
Religious narratives are known to influence people's attitudes and beliefs on various issues, including those related to reproductive health and rights. In particular, there is a strong connection between religion and attitudes towards surrogacy. Some religions see pregnancy as a natural process that should not be tampered with or manipulated. Therefore, they may view surrogacy as an immoral act because it involves using someone else's body for reproduction purposes.